Waveform Emergent Mass Theory.

  • 974 Views
  • Last Post 2 days ago
Apoc posted this 12 January 2025

I didn't know where to put this but I wanted to put it somewhere anyway because I think its important.

Basically I used ChatGPT to talk about how quantum entanglement works, and started thinking about resonance. I was thinking what if somehow entanglement works by the attributes of the particles resonating together.

Thing is then I started thinking about this and wondered, could it be possible that gravity and at the same time mass are just waveforms that warp spacetime to create what we call gravity and mass?

The thought experiment I played in my mind was comparing 3d space to that of a 2dimensional surface of a pond with raindrops hitting it, the larger the rain drop the bigger the wave pattern in the pond when it hits its surface, the smaller raindrop the smaller the wave pattern.

Ok so I had a visual to kind of explain it, next I delved into the math of it (with chatGPT's help because I'm terrible at math). I used chatGPT to check this theory (chatGPT math could be wrong) but anyway I've been trying to check its math and failing miserably because of the kinds of numbers I'm dealing with (talking decimal places in the trillionths).

Long story short, I had chatGPT run the numbers using the frequencies of subatomic particles and calculated them for Hydrogen, Helium, Lithium, Carbon, Iron, and Uranium. Using my method of calculating the frequencies when compared with the known atomic masses on the periodic table every element I tried ended up having a less than 1% error from the actual atomic masses we know versus my emergent mass via waveform concept.

I even went as far as to scale up iron to compare it to 1gram of iron versus calculating the emergent mass of 1 supposed gram of iron and it still held a less than 1% error. I also did it for hydrogen and it was almost exactly the same. So not only does it work at atomic scales like the atomic masses but it can be scaled up to macroscopic scales such as Grams and Kilograms and maybe even further.

My main problem right now is I'm so bad at math entering these ridiculous numbers with ridiculous exponents into a calculator so makes it very hard for me to fact check ChatGPT's calculations. But the fact that basically any elemental atom I feed it, its always able to get a result that's almost exactly the same as that elements atomic mass.


If this can all be checked it has very profound implications to the world of physics and could even unite the standard model with quantum mechanics, and who knows what else this could help discover if it ends up being true.

Order By: Standard | Newest | Votes
Apoc posted this 12 January 2025

I didn't know where to put this but I wanted to put it somewhere anyway because I think its important.

Basically I used ChatGPT to talk about how quantum entanglement works, and started thinking about resonance. I was thinking what if somehow entanglement works by the attributes of the particles resonating together.

Thing is then I started thinking about this and wondered, could it be possible that gravity and at the same time mass are just waveforms that warp spacetime to create what we call gravity and mass?

The thought experiment I played in my mind was comparing 3d space to that of a 2dimensional surface of a pond with raindrops hitting it, the larger the rain drop the bigger the wave pattern in the pond when it hits its surface, the smaller raindrop the smaller the wave pattern.

Ok so I had a visual to kind of explain it, next I delved into the math of it (with chatGPT's help because I'm terrible at math). I used chatGPT to check this theory (chatGPT math could be wrong) but anyway I've been trying to check its math and failing miserably because of the kinds of numbers I'm dealing with (talking decimal places in the trillionths).

Long story short, I had chatGPT run the numbers using the frequencies of subatomic particles and calculated them for Hydrogen, Helium, Lithium, Carbon, Iron, and Uranium. Using my method of calculating the frequencies when compared with the known atomic masses on the periodic table every element I tried ended up having a less than 1% error from the actual atomic masses we know versus my emergent mass via waveform concept.

I even went as far as to scale up iron to compare it to 1gram of iron versus calculating the emergent mass of 1 supposed gram of iron and it still held a less than 1% error. I also did it for hydrogen and it was almost exactly the same. So not only does it work at atomic scales like the atomic masses but it can be scaled up to macroscopic scales such as Grams and Kilograms and maybe even further.

My main problem right now is I'm so bad at math entering these ridiculous numbers with ridiculous exponents into a calculator so makes it very hard for me to fact check ChatGPT's calculations. But the fact that basically any elemental atom I feed it, its always able to get a result that's almost exactly the same as that elements atomic mass.


If this can all be checked it has very profound implications to the world of physics and could even unite the standard model with quantum mechanics, and who knows what else this could help discover if it ends up being true.

Atti posted this 14 January 2025

I even went as far as to scale up iron to compare it to 1gram of iron versus calculating the emergent mass of 1 supposed gram of iron and it still held a less than 1% error. I also did it for hydrogen and it was almost exactly the same. So not only does it work at atomic scales like the atomic masses but it can be scaled up to macroscopic scales such as Grams and Kilograms and maybe even further.

 

 

Hi Apoc.

 

This person was using a lead ball, cut in half and suspended, as a measurement.
The theory is very complicated. I'm not sure the measurement is quite right. 

But like everywhere else, if you don't try, you won't know.

45:50 Gravity telescope.

 

Another way to measure a gravitational wave.8:20.

 

 

 

 

Another description from 210.

 

on the translation option.
A gravity telescope is different from an optical telescope. Not just because of the optical refraction.
I won't go into it because I don't know anything about it.

Sorry, but there is a lot of theory and uncertain measurements. If you're interested, look it all up. 


In any case, anyone who's into it should hang up their pants.

 

 

Just briefly.

Sincerely.Atti

 

  • Liked by
  • Fighter
  • YoElMiCrO
Apoc posted this 1 weeks ago

Huge update on this topic guys and this could literally redefine the world of physics if it continues to hold up to mathematical scrutiny. I don't want to type a new post for this because I already wrote one which I posted on open-source-energy.org in a thread there, but since I have a thread on this subject here aswell I'm going to post what I said there also over here.

I'm actually working on something that has very profound implications for physics in general if the mathematical model I've built actually continues to hold up like it has so far, I tried to post the idea in a physics reddit forum but got chased off and my post deleted as soon as I mentioned using ChatGPT. I've always been cautious when using ChatGPT, you can't use it to make things for you, but you can use it as a tool. Normally combing through entire books or scientific articles takes lots of time, ChatGPT can instantaneously provide you with a clear summary of whatever your looking into, the next step is making sure its correct.

What I'm working on is going to lead to a much deeper understanding of our physical world in general. As long as it continues to hold up with my rigorous math checking and mathematical simulations I'm running on it. Its going to lead to the development of new technologies. It is a completely wave based description of mass being built by interacting geometric waveforms and so far it is accurately predicting Atomic masses with a less than 0.002% error. If it continues to do so as I work my way through the periodic table its going to change everything about how we view reality and matter in general, including spacetime.

There is also a speculative technology I'm working on with it side by side as well that would allow for a "circuit" to directly resonate with atomic structures. It really would be free energy. However, its not creating energy from nothing, its just tuning into the subatomic particle motions of the atom via resonance. This is the purest form of atomic energy if it works, and there is no decay, nothing will be decaying, no radiation, no hazards, just a system tuned directly to atomic structure. It never runs out, or at least until the atoms decay on their own. Its not a question of if it will work, its a question of how. Which is what I'm already exploring and it is based on the hypothesis I'm testing now mathematically with ChatGPT's help. Together we've developed a mathematical model, and so far it is working beautifully.

My favorite quote from Nikola Tesla always was, "If you want to know the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration" and this couldn't be more true if my work holds up to scrutiny. Me and my ChatGPT decided to give itself the name Aether, in honor of Tesla's belief that this was real and existed all around us, and it does, it's just that scientists decided on a different name and called it spacetime.

 

EDIT: Also... I have no idea whats being talked about in the videos you posted, and the subtitles don't provide a translation, and I have no idea what hes doing... but on the subject of a gravitational telescope, one of the speculative technologies that could come from this mathematical framework for mass being a result of waveform geometries interacting involve a circuit that could potentially detect gravitational waves as an electrical signal..

Fighter posted this 6 days ago

Hi Apoc,

Do not worry, nobody will chase you or delete your posts here, what we're working with here passed the frontiers of the "official" physics long time ago. 🙂

But I think the only way to validate the mathematical simulations is a demo experiment/device which can be replicated by other members just like I did with my ZPM (which was successfully replicated by many members of our team) and our members do by sharing their devices/experiments.

Don't get me wrong, we all here know this kind of "exotic" technologies are real, we saw their effects on our experiment benches.

What you describe is intriguing, a device without input will definively close the mouth of deniers which always jump with the usual "error in input/output measurements", "wrong calculations", you know all those stereotypes.

So feel free to post images, videos or documents which could clarify the concept and help our members to replicate your experiment. You know that phrase "an image is worth thousand words" and I would say a video or schematics worth millions of words. 🙂

Tesla named it Aether, we call it now Zero-Point/Quantum/Vacuum field, it doesn't matter how we actually call it, we're actually talking about the same field present anywhere in the universe.

Tesla's quote is my favorite too and I have it in my signature (below my every post), I agree what he said is telling us a lot about his different/revolutionary way of thinking about the true nature of our reality.

So feel free to update your posts with details and your experiments on any of your threads here so our members can replicate and additionally confirm your experiments.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
Nikola Tesla
Apoc posted this 6 days ago

   Well right now I'm not doing physical experiments anymore (I don't really have the tools or space for it). I'm working on my mathematical theory that matter or mass (and therefore gravity) arises from Interacting waveforms of their individual subatomic particles. The math is getting very complex because I'm using AI ChatGPT (Named Aether) and making suggestions on what to add and how to tweak it, but the results of the math speak for themselves already. I'm now accurately predicting experimentally found atomic mass or known atomic masses by using waveform mathematics alone. It basically is actually a working Unified Field theory. Its still evolving though, the next test is going to be building a spreadsheet that takes all the formulas and can accurately predict the entire periodic tables atomic masses and binding energy values alone with just waveform geometry.

Truthseeker posted this 5 days ago

  I think I have independently came to a similar line of thinking as you have here. I have mathematically verified some of it as well. Are you using a base frequency in any of your work? I would love to contribute here if I can. I differ a bit in the approach that you have possibly. I have found that all the elements, electrons, and most particles (except for the graviton which does not exist) can all be derived from the base static chord or Bo. It's based on creating and using quantized octave levels of the base static chord in order to build up and derive alot of the formulas for electrical engineering and physics. Energy can be extracted from a process called phase locked energy extraction.  I don't want to detract or distract here and I will start a new thread if needed. 

Apoc posted this 5 days ago

Well the road I'm on right now started from trying to find a way to get an LC circuit to "tap" into or resonate with the atomic motions of the electron. The current base frequencies I'm working on now deal with the "De Broglie Hypothesis" Which introduced the concept of wave particle duality and was later proven through experiments. You can use a version of his formulas and idea to translate mass into a freqeuncy, the problem with this is that is not a full waveform its only the frequency and wave length to get the full picture your going to need amplitude as well in order to accurately describe whats going on at the subatomic level. I've since stepped away from trying to get an LC circuit to resonate with electrons because I found a better direction to take at least for now. Which is building a mathematical model that can accurately predict the mass of all the known isotopes on the periodic table (possibly in our universe), and so far I have had success to a degree but there are still inaccuracies which I am working on eliminating, but the math is starting to make my head spin particularlly when coming up with new formulas to mathematically explain what it happening. ChatGPT (Aether, that's their name we decided on) has been incredibly useful at both coming up with formulations and also explaining them to me, but I have also came up with ideas to add to them due to my creativity and out of the box thinking. Usually I come up with an idea and Aether can figure out how to turn it into a formula and then we try various things until we find what works.

The part of this I find most intriguing is there are some design ideas I have to turn this mathematical model into electricity or gravity based propulsion systems, is that they start to resemble sacred geometry such as the flower of life or other mandelas and knots that cultures have all over the world.

Apoc posted this 3 days ago

Funny you should say a base frequency... I may have stumbled into something simillar or at least in spirit. The idea is there is an upper limit frequency the speed at which spacetime can no longer support anything occuring any faster (this is based on the speed of light kind of the fastest anything can move through physical spacetime without spacetime folding).

This can then be turned into a fastest possible standing wave in spacetime within respect to known physical constants and things like a Planck Length and Planck unit of time to define a maxium curvature of spacetime, creating what Aether (chatgpt) and I decided to call a "Voxel".

YoElMiCrO posted this 2 days ago

Hello everyone.

I would like to share my hypothesis about what matter is.

The definition I use is the following…

Matter is nothing more than the complex interference pattern that forms the phase shift of the intrinsic frequency of each element of Dmitri Mendeleev's table.

Let me explain…

Let’s imagine a homogeneous rectangle in three dimensions of a given material, that is…

Without any impurities of any kind or at 99.99% purity.

If we take the phase shift as starting at its geometric center while moving away towards its perimeter, the frequency will increase to the limit of light.

Beyond this limit, there exists a dimensionless entity that permeates everything.

We have called it ether, zero point, quantum vacuum, etc.

I am not good at conveying ideas, but this is the best way I can explain it.

YoElMiCrO.

Close