Aharonov-Bohm effect as zero-point energy concentrator

Hey Fighter, any initial thoughts on the use of Finemet for these experiments? Are you seeing anything to indicate it is worth the price?

Hi UndisclosedMember,

Talking about standard transformers, the price is justified by the properties of the alloy, it's superior to Metglas alloy (link to larger image here):

The core that I have (F3CC0125) is the biggest in these series so it can be used to replace a bigger Metglas core (maybe even AMCC1000 ?) with smaller AT (Ampere-Turn) and smaller core losses.

So I think this is how officially the price is justified.

Related to our technologies, the only way the price can be justified is if it's doing what Bearden says: the separation of the curled and uncurled A potentials from the magnetic field of a permanent magnet.

From my first experiment (where I tried just a 1:1 transformer) the surprise came from the strong BEMF I received in the primary. Even if the transformer's configuration was not correct (too many turns in the coils) and the 12V/5W light bulb on secondary was illuminating very weak, the BEMF received in primary was capable to have a 220V/70W light bulb illuminating much stronger (link to larger image here):

That's what I consider a first anomaly related to this core.

I also hope the anomaly Bearden is talking about is real too.

But I don't expect to be easy to find the configuration. As Bearden said, in order to find the right configuration, "we have to keep tweaking the heck out of it":

"Every time I shake or perturb this A potential it makes an E field... And the sharper the change the greater the size of the E field from space around the core. This does not happen in any other normal transformer in the whole world as far as we're aware. From the space outside the MEG there arises then these tremendously strong E fields which radiate into every coil it's rounded on this transformer.... The biggest action in the MEG is an electric field transformer not a magnetic field transformer...We have to keep tweaking the heck out of it... You do it by trial and error and adjust until it's mostly additive. If you build those out of phase so they're subtractive rather than additive you build a worse transformer than the normal... But if you get them additive you beat the heck out of every other transformer in the world because it goes way over unity."

The difficult part is that uncurled A potential outside the core cannot be detected/measured directly. The only way to detect/measure it is to disturb it so it produce an electric field which can be collected by a coil.

So I should do it by trial and error: add magnetic field (using the 7x7x25mm magnets), try a large range of pulses and frequencies on a coil and measure the electric field in another coil. But there is no way to know if that electric field collected by the second coil is produced by the A potential outside the core or it's produced by the magnetic flux in the core like a standard transformer does. About this problem I'll post a possible solution later here and ask the guys more advanced in the transformers technologies if it's valid or not.

So I'll need to "tweak the heck out of it" in a painful trial and error process (adjust coils, adjust permanent magnet flux, adjust frequency and pulse width) until I'll get closer to the correct configuration.

But if in the end the experiment will be successfully then the core it's worth the price and we'll get to a new level with our devices because then we'll have a proven method of concentrating and harvesting energy directly from the zero-point/quantum/aether field. This is what I hope for and this is the reason why I invested so much in this experiment.