Beyond Unity - Is an automatic system possible?

Atti posted this 30 April 2022 - Last Edited 30 April 2022

Welcome everyone!

We have a circuit with an on and off power source.
Now imagine a black box with a structure that provides infinite energy.
So we only have one source of energy coming out.
Can this exist?
The question is what might be in the black box.
Self-feeding structure.
What could this structure be? Can such a structure exist? How can you produce energy? What is energy? What is the mechanism that works continuously (or until exhaustion)? Is it moving or not?
We are always looking for answers to this.
Some people claim to have found the mechanism. There are two kinds of human attitudes.
Some say:
-I show some drawings or some theories. If you can’t do it you are stupid or just TROLL.
-or I'll show you a shot of the structure (maybe some nonsensical drawings) but buy it below. For money.
Yet human curiosity drills our side there.
The little devil sits on our shoulders and is constantly poking with his fork.
That's where the thought rides within us.
In vain. The desire for knowledge has always been the driving force behind man.
Reality doesn't matter just experience.
But what makes it work? Does it really work at all?
I will now outline a series of events. And that’s just an excerpt from my humble experience so far.
I don’t want to line up like quite a few “inventors”.
That is, to say something. It shows a few frames or videos, and then everyone finds out the rest on their own.
Then if it fails, blame everyone.
Let's say it's TROLL.
Let's just talk about everything, not the point.
He tries to show the point but also falsely.
So.

Since I am not an inventor or an over-trained engineer and I have nothing specific, I will only share a few basic thoughts with you.
Full of mistakes, but full of possibilities!
Possibilities that have been discovered by others besides me. This is just a series of thoughts that others have already done during the experiments.
I did some of them again. There is a phenomenon.
-The first and simplest version:

2:010 we can see a higher peak reflected in the incoming sine wave. If set correctly, this will reduce the input energy.
I have processed these phenomena. The E.r. shown in my videos.
-Motion of magnetic fields under partial guidance:
Directed primary magnetic field
Directed secondary magnetic field
Directed permanent magnetic field
Iron fuxus
Coil flux (scattered) discrimination.
Closure of magnetic paths by the shortest path.
Resonance.
Reflection (back to source field)
Continuous circular motion.

Liked by
and 2 others

Admin

Fighter posted this 26 January 2023

Quoting:Atti

It was the second time that the electricity "stung" me. Suddenly, that ugly sentence came out of my mouth. This is really not correct. I could have cut that out. After that, I will limit the video.

Don't worry, Atti, that's a normal reaction, you want to hear the Romanian version ? 😄

I "felt" electricity 4 times and one time it was because of ZPM's output, I was dizzy for a few minutes after that.

For safety some electrical gloves and for some experiments (like Vidura's experiment) high-voltage electrical gloves should be mandatory. I'm thinking to start looking and buying something like this.

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

Liked by
and 2 others

Vidura posted this 27 January 2023

But what did we see in the video?

Atti.

It can be clearly observed how the hot end of the resonant circuit shifts to the other side when the ground is connected. It is clear that it is a resonator with distributed parameters(standing waves). An interresting detail is the offset on the groundcurrent. Also the narrow coils on the top become resonant, there seems to be a constructive relationship with the big coils. As there are distributed parameters, also the magnetic side(current antinodes) should be detectable.

Good experiment!

Vidura

Liked by
and 2 others

Atti posted this 29 January 2023

Hi Vidura.

Partly based on what you formulated. On the other hand, it can also be observed that the neon lamp does not even touch the wire (from about 5 mm) but it already lights up. So the voltage is very high in the right position. Grounding is not required!

I was testing the AMCC20-Amcc320 setup but with separated coils, the primary and secondary windings are physically placed far from each other. The tests show that the secondary coil's field created by the load current reflects back, with a certain delay, to the input source via the primary coil, i.e. it charges back. With appropiate settings this is like a battery regenerator. One input, one output. I did not evaluate the V - I values because I did not want to do calculations.

Atti.

Liked by
and 1 others

Atti posted this 06 March 2023

Well, there's nothing special here, just a battery charge. (?)
We know the Adams motor-generator charging method, don't we?! What if we add the parametric resonance method?

Atti

Liked by
and 1 others

Jagau posted this 11 March 2023 - Last Edited 11 March 2023

Hy Atti,
I looked at your YT and your work on the MEG seems very advanced.

I was wondering if with magnets in the center of the merglass joint like Bearden did it would have a different effect?

JL Naudin said this on the MEG with his latest version

Notes : It is interesting to notice that the measured power required by the MEG electronic control board ( TL494, BUZZ11, LED... ) is 1.75 Watts ( without a load connected at the MEG Outputs ). When the output is loaded with the 9 W lamp, the DC power input is 3.25 Watts. So, the real power used by the lamp is 3.25 - 1.75 = 1.5 Watts at the INPUT with a measured OUTPUT = 6.76 Watts

you can find here all the results proving the effectiveness of MEG

http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megv21.htm

If Jean Louis Naudin did it then it works and as in many situations everything is in the art of taking the measures in the right way.

Jagau

Liked by

Atti posted this 11 March 2023

I was wondering if with magnets in the center of the merglass joint like Bearden did it would have a different effect?

Hi Jagau!

I do not know how correct the information provided by T. Bearden or Naudin is. So I use it only as informational data. Especially the control electronics.
But regardless, the controller is worth a look
diagram of the input coil. Or look for functional similarities.

I'm just working on it now. I'm progressing slowly. So nothing is certain yet.

And maybe it's all an illusion.

Atti.

Liked by

Atti posted this 12 March 2023

This was missed from the previous post.

Atti.

Liked by

Jagau posted this 12 March 2023

Hi Atti

It is not forgotten that JL Naudin is a seasoned engineer and in his measurement technique he used a conditioned resistor. I have never used this technique but it needs to be studied.

Here's how do it:

http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/negres.htm

Jagau

Liked by

Atti posted this 18 December 2024

Let's look at another test.
This is not the classic ZPM. But let's look at the similarities. We see similarities in other circuits.

You don't need to load now.
Here, the primary and secondary windings are selected separately. Therefore, the primary circuit and the secondary circuit must be interpreted separately.
In this arrangement, the primary winding is not connected in accordance with the inductance and excitation, but oppositely. So the induced magnetic field repel each other. (L1-L2 NS-SN can be found in the drawing) Thus, there is no induced voltage in a symmetrical secondary winding.
The inductance here is almost zero.
There is some inductance due to loose coupling only.
Although we know well that every wire has inductance, so it cannot be absolutely zero. Even if it has the same direction as the magnetic polarity. Especially if the frequency increases.
Here, the coils have mutually repelling magnetic fields.
The question is, are there any advantages to mutually repelling magnets placed on a common iron core? Any inductance? Any induced voltage?
- Differentiate the primary excitation flux (magnetic field)
-Distinguish between the flux excited by the secondary current (magnetic field)
- Differentiate between the flux enclosed in the common iron core (magnetic field)
Let's see the reaction due to the field excited by the secondary current with respect to the primary.
- Although I have already written it, I will note it again: this is the same phenomenon with Amcc20 or Amcc320 or CRT ferrite or flyback ferrite. (visible on the workbench)
-The recharge is less, but not negligible. It depends on the setting. It depends on the fill factor rather than the frequency.
-The switching mosfet is cold all the time.
- The phenomenon also exists when the earthing is disconnected. So there is no need for earthing in this case.
- This is also the case with batteries.

An impulse and a reaction. The size of the recharge is the question.

s

This is a different arrangement. Detail.The effect is still the same (of course for those who know what it's about).

Atti.

Liked by
and 1 others