Non-Inductive Coil Experiment

1.6K Views
Last Post 6 days ago

bri77 posted this 3 weeks ago

I have tried to replicate the Non-Inductive Coil Experiment. I get similar effects to what Tinker (neale) gets.

For the wave forms, the saw tooth drops down really fast, so it's for like 70%+ of the time. When I increase the frequency from 3k or so to 12-15k the wave form becomes similar to what's shown in video 7.

I do not have something to measure current right now.

Using amcc0320 Proterial

Primary - cw 14awg ,1.628mm. Wound on top of poc1.

Poc1 - cw 20awg, .813mm

Poc2 - ccw 20awg, 0.813

The input are all 5v and the amp shown are the amps on the x-tronic px-70 power supply (linear power supply). The pwm generator is FeelTech fy6300. It is set to 10v ampl and 5v offs square wave (This is to get 0v to 10v square wave pulse). The mosfet used is (IRFP4227PBFXKMA1): https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/196/Infineon_IRFI4227_DS_v01_02_EN-1227486.pdf. This has a 21mOhm RdsOn. The signal output from the pwm generator is connected directly to the gate of the mosfet. The primary + is connected directly to the power px-70 power supply. The primary - is connected to the drain of the mosfet. I have a 25v 470uF low impedance capacitor conncted to the priamry + coil and the gnd of the power supply.

One 12v 5w bulb on poc1. Another 12v 5w bulb put on poc2.

I tried to get the peak voltage the same for both poc1, poc2 with the following coils:

22mm wide
primary 7 turns (single layer) (around 13mm wide on top of poc1 about)
poc1 60 (3 layers) turns 21.8mH 1.105uF 0.6ohms
poc2 60 (3 layers) turns 21.8mh 1.138uf 0.6ohms
2800hz 10% 5v .235a poc1: 17.29v peak, 2.33v avg poc2: 17.28v peak, 1.84v avg

22mm wide
primary 7 turns (mutilple layers) (around, 8mm wide on top of poc1 about. I should try to get it closer to 1/4th which is 5.5mm.)
poc1 60 (3 layers) turns 21.8mH
poc2 60 (3 layers) turns 21.8mH
2800hz 10% 5v .238a poc1: 17.77v peak, 2.33v avg poc2: 17.77v peak, 1.74v avg

53mm wide
primary 7 turns
poc1 55 (1 layer) turns 18.28mH
poc2 55 (1 layer) turns 18.33mH
3700hz 10% 5v .195a poc1: 15.4v peak, 1.86v avg poc2: 15.5v peak, 1.57v avg

22mm wide
primary 9 turns
poc1 180 (9 layers) turns 192.5mH
poc2 180 (9 layers) turns 194.0mH
300hz 5% 5v .345a poc1: 18.85v peak, 1.98v avg poc2: 17.36v peak, 1.61v avg

All of these experiments, the sawtooth ended really early (70%+ flat line) before the next pulse.

The lights were mostly the same brightness.

With the 180 turns on the poc, the frequency had to drop really low (300hz), for the peak voltage to be about the same, and the sawtooth ends really fast, so there's a lot of flat time. Also the shorter width coils the frequency had to be lower, for the peak voltage to be the same.

When I raise the frequency, the saw tooth wave form is closer to what tinker and video 7 shows, but poc1 output would increase (4-5v average), and poc2 output would be (200-500mv average).

I am not sure what can be done to get a better sawtooth waveform (going all the way to the next pulse start) and having both poc1 and poc2 output to be close to each other.

I've tried winding primary over both pocs with different number of winds on each poc. I also tried winding the primary over one poc and then switching the direction of the wind before winding over the second poc. The wave forms weren't what was shown in video 7, but I did see in one of the cases both coil would have the same wave sawtooth waveform (like what you get on poc1, where it dips down when pwm rise then spikes up when the pwm falls.) I'm not sure if this is the way to get both pocs to have the same output, but it used a lot more power. One of the combinations of the diodes the output was about the same, the other combinations one was 2x more than the other.

I've tried all 4 combinations of diode direction on both pocs also.

The main thing I want to try and get is to have both pocs have the same output and a good sawtooth waveform (not ending early before next pwm pulse). I might of missed something, but the width of the coil if it's smaller, the magnetic field strength is supposed to increase, which is supposed to increase voltage /current?, but it didn't really increase that much for me with the 60turns (22mm wide, 3 layers) and the 55turns winds (55mm wide, 1 layer). I've tried higher voltages also, but it did not seem to give the result that I wanted (I forgot what the results were). I'm not sure if it's my switching system, but the square wave seemed ok, not super clean. I'll try building the "Quadratron" to see if it makes much of a difference. I think the things that I have left to try is the quadatron, change power supply?, shorten length of wires. Get a better 1/4th width ratio of the primary coil over the secondary. Maybe something is wrong with my core? or try a nanocrystalline core instead of amorphous?

I'll probably try replicating fighter's zpm also, once I understand things more. I've destroyed a 12v sff power supply and a few mosfets so far. I stopped destroying mosfets now, and using the 470uf capacitor the power supply does not go into protection mode? (Clicks and resets back to 5v) anymore and I can increase voltage.

Liked by

Inception posted this 1 weeks ago

bri77,

You dated yourself when you mentioned 300 BAUD and BBS. 😁 Been there and did that too.

Post your Rife machine in a new thread if you think it will help experimenters understand the value and operation of the device. My introduction to Royal Rife was pre-Y2K. Does yours work? Have you gained any health advantages while using it?

If you would post a complete schematic of your non-inductive coil circuit, and photos, it would invoke more helpful responses.

Should you need an application for drawing schematics, Micro-cap is now free (though a bit clumsy) online. It has enough features to draw decent coil-mosfet circuitry. I'm sure others here can recommend better software.

Inception

Liked by

bri77 posted this 6 days ago

Inception,

I haven't really tested the rife machine, so I dont know if it works. I did buy a spooky 2 and used the tens pad and did like only half of the detox. I have no idea if I've gained any health advantages. I think this is the hard part to prove that it works.

You can see Anthony Holland shattering cancer cells under a microscope with a rife machine (I dont think he can shatter 100% of the cancer cells, but it's probably good enough). Also, people mentioned Royal Rife cured like 10 or so patients with cancer back then. I think one way to prove if the rife machine works is if you can shatter an amoeba under the microscope. The common sense in me thinks that an amoeba looks really close to how a white blood cell looks, so it'd be bad if you shatter white blood cells. I'm not sure how the range on the machine would work also.

I pretty much got side tracked with these new experiments. These experiments are probably way above my knowledge and ability currently.

Liked by

Admin

Fighter posted this 6 days ago

Quoting:AlteredUnity

Bri: you're always welcome to participate in any experiment on here, but post here again you may get banned there. We are all about progress, I understood what you're trying to achieve and you have the right hand rule correct. On Schematic's you will see the dot next to the top of the primary(or where ever current enters), for the output/secondary the dot represent where current or voltage is coming out. Check my thread on his site, you will see different working arrangements. Or Jagau's, or Fighter's, or Atti's, or YoElMiCrO's, or CD'S, baerndorfer, wisiti, you know all the disgraced people that he is talking about.

Hi Bri77,

I see he started telling you the same bullsh*t about our team:

Usually we ignore him, that's his way of seeking attention because he got nothing else.

But I have just a few things to say to you and these are verifiable facts.

80% of the experiments and data you see on the old site are made by the members of our core team.

The guy became a paranoid nut and started attacking his own team for invented reasons just because we did our own experiments and basically ignored his so-called "partnered output coils" Bible and his aspirations of religious-group-wannabe. A lot more details and a lot of proofs can be seen in our public answer thread here.

While I made public demos and data of my ZPM (which was also replicated here by the members of our team) powering 2 x 12V/55W light bulbs with minimal input he wasn't and still isn't able after so many years to show a single demo device using his so-called "partnered output coils".

When you see a "research" site looking like this:

or posts like this:

it should make you understand what you're dealing with.

In a few words the guy has nothing, he is just blabbing for so many years.

I'm telling you this so you won't waste your time and resources on a road going nowhere.

What you want to do with what I told you is up to you, your choice.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

Liked by

Our Beyond-Unity Devices

Members Currently Online:

No one online at the moment