This is my replication of Jagau's Micro-Generator:
The circuit for those who want to do it.
If you need advice, just ask, I'll be happy to help you.
Jagau
| "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." | ||
| Nikola Tesla | ||
Thank you Jagau, yes, I can't wait to see it in action during the summer rains and storms 🙂
And I think I know what was the source of energy when it was flashing very fast. In that night there was a series of 3-grade earthquakes in Vrancea which is a region of Romania with frequent low-grade tectonic activity at about 100 km from Bucharest.
If there is no activity in the atmosphere and the device is flashing very fast that means it's activity in the ground and this device can sense that too.
It's a very well known fact that before earthquakes there is a big energy concentration of energy in the atmosphere, energy produced by the tectonic plates under pressure. Sometimes when the eartquake will be very strong the accumulation of energy in the area is so intense that people see lights in the air in that region hours or sometimes days before the earthquake is produced:
https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/environment/2019/04/earthquake-lights-explained
Your device, my friend, is far from just a toy. If properly calibrated this device could be an early warning system for earthquakes and could save many lives.
I don't know why they don't use technologies like this for earthquakes early warning systems.
Regards,
Fighter
| "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." | ||
| Nikola Tesla | ||
Last night all my city lacked electricity, due to a heavy rainstorm.
I could almost have predicted the microgenerator was crazy as a broom
Jagau
So no electricity on kilometers around.
As I suspected after the experiment with my router's wifi shutdown, the device is not using human-made energy emissions or at least is not depending on them (I suppose the mobile network was still active in the area but it cannot be the source of device's intense activity you saw).
Very nice, now we have the proof... 😊
Regards,
Fighter
| "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." | ||
| Nikola Tesla | ||
Just a small update, so far the few experiments I found time to try related to in-air virtual grounding were not successful.
I still have some more ideas I didn't tried yet, just need to find some time to test them.
Regards,
Fighter
| "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." | ||
| Nikola Tesla | ||
In the weekend (while I put back on my experiments table my second ZPM and tested it) I found very interesting things about the device.
When I turn the oscilloscope on it seems to interfere with the device's functionality, the LEDs are not blinking anymore:
The cause is unknown.
On the other hand when ZPM is running the Micro-Generator goes crazy 😄
It's true I saw it before blinking faster during rains or thunderstorms but I never saw it like this before:
We can see where ZPM is taking his extra-energy from. I don't think we're talking about just simply radio spectrum here.
ZPM's asymmetric and opposing magnetic fields at high frequency are disturbing the zero-point field. By disturbing the zero-point field, more energy becomes available in the area. Energy which the Micro-Generator is taking advantage of and it's harvesting it in the same time with the ZPM.
It's nice to see two totally different devices working together and using the same energy source (the zero-point field). ☺️
Regards,
Fighter
| "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." | ||
| Nikola Tesla | ||
Hello everyone.
@Jagau.
Energy Harvesting (EH) from human or environmental sources has proven to be an effective alternative or complement for battery charging or other uses........
As a starting point if you take just 4 diodes connected in a bridge with no circuit, the two AC of the bridge to earth, you should have a DC at the output of the bridge of 10 volts and more. To have best resutl diode shouldbe very fast diode like UF4001,
Only with regard to the first test measurement you suggest. A test with several fast diodes and a 10yF capacitor. Grounding (possibly contact potential difference) Then touching by hand. You can see the amount of charging. So the grounding or "antenna" issue,or problem. Then just the capacitor charging from simple power fluctuation (potential difference).
Why does the capacitor not charge when there is no mains voltage of some kind?
Atti.
Sorry I'm back from a trip
I'll look at this and try to answer you
Jagau
Hi Atti
For the different types of experience i did with this circuit, it captures the ambient energy of several kinds either radiation from various human activity, electromagnetic radiation by coils close to the circuit (see the fighter tests) and electrostaic radiation in general that either from the ground or in the air. If you connect to an electrical box as you did, you also capture its radiation.
For this experience to be successful, you must have two different grounds not attached to the same point, for example: the ground on one side AC of the bridge and on the other side AC of the bridge, your body with your fingers or another mass that does not touch the previous one.
Do this little test, remove your capacitor, on one side of AC bridge, connect the earth as you did first and on the other side AC just place your fingers, Tell me how much voltage do you have on your voltmeter connect on DC side of the bridge without capacitor?
Jagau
Hi Jagau!
I didn't see much point in the experiment but I did it out of respect for you! (and for others, of course!)
The voltage collected from the environment and rectified by the diode bridge can only supply a very small current, because such a "voltage source" has a very high internal resistance and the terminal voltage drops even at a small (microAmp) load. This can be seen from the charging time of the capacitor. Also from the difference in the values measured by the multimeter and Deprez.
The AC input to the diode bridge was connected to two grounds and got 10 volts (or more) on the DC output of the bridge (no buffer capacitor). If there are large voltage differences between the grounds,that is a problem in my opinion. Or more likely some sort of mains leakage that you have stumbled across. But I obviously have no way of knowing that from here.
My answer to your question is shown in the video.
Here you see two metals of the same quality (electroplated) in the first case. I then replaced one with a brass electrode. Electrode potential. No further explanation needed.
Standard UHF antenna. Also the value is visible. This also needs no explanation.
However, if I touch the cover of the reading lamp, I can clearly see the difference due to the mains voltage! The reading lamp is double insulated and not switched on.
In my opinion, if there is a potential difference (or a radiating source), this is the case.
This is why I find it misleading to use the mains earthing of the national electricity supplier for such measurements. Especially for multi-storey prefabricated flats.
(All countries have their own relevant installation safety regulations. Also for earthing. EMI and transient mains filters, etc.)
I understand that transmission lines, radiating transmitters, mobile signal repeaters, etc. are everywhere in our environment, especially in densely populated areas, and can create strong EM fields, but in the case of general grid "blackouts", no such energy collection occurs.
Just to avoid any misunderstanding.
Of course if I am wrong and properly presented example then I will accept it and correct my opinion.
Atti.
Quoting:Atti
I understand that transmission lines, radiating transmitters, mobile signal repeaters, etc. are everywhere in our environment, especially in densely populated areas, and can create strong EM fields, but in the case of general grid "blackouts", no such energy collection occurs.
Just to avoid any misunderstanding.
Of course if I am wrong and properly presented example then I will accept it and correct my opinion.
Hi Atti,
How do you know that "in the case of general grid "blackouts", no such energy collection occurs", did you checked that ?..
This device is not using only man-made radio spectrum, it's also using natural radio spectrum (generated by Earth but also received from space).
Check my post here, I checked if the device is using my router's dual wireless (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz), turning the wireless on or off didn't made any difference on device's behavior. Compare this video with any of the previous videos in that thread, the wireless on or off doesn't make any difference. And it should make big difference if the device would use only man-made radio spectrum !
I shutdown both wireless networks for a few minutes and didn't noticed any differences in the intensity or frequency of the pulses, at least not noticeable visually.
So this is the video of the device running when there are 0 radio emissions from my router:
Regards,
Fighter
Also the blackout scenario, I didn't had any blackout yet since the device is running but Jagau did, check his post here.
Last night all my city lacked electricity, due to a heavy rainstorm.
I could almost have predicted the microgenerator was crazy as a broom
Jagau
So that scenario is also tested.
Regards,
Fighter
| "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." | ||
| Nikola Tesla | ||
