Beyond Unity - Fighter's ZPM (Zero Point Module) failed replication by Itsu

Itsu posted this 07 November 2022

Hello all,

i opened this thread to discuss my replication of Fighter's ZPE (Zero Point Module).

I already opened a similar thread on OUR.com (https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4374.msg101654#msg101654 ), but will transfer some data from there to here.

Initially i understood that the below diagram was correct and complete, but it turns out its not.
There is a ground connection somewhere, but i am not sure where it is exactly, hopefully someone can tell me.
The MOSFET is shown wrong as the Drain and Source should be swapped, which was corrected later in Fighter his thread so therefor the mentioning in red.

I have build up a similar circuit and the data is shown here:
(Be aware that the induction measurement was done at 10kHz, but due to the influence of the metglas core it can be (and is) completly different on other frequencies, see my thread on OUR.com for a VNA scan of the coil/core)

I am using a 12V battery for now as my PS (minus NOT grounded) was acting weird due to all the pulses coming back from the ZPE device.
Up till now no special effects or resonance in a 0 to 5MHz range are seen with this setup, but as said the grounding may be the problem here.

Itsu

zpm

Liked by
and 3 others

YoElMiCrO posted this 10 November 2022 - Last Edited 10 November 2022

Hello everyone.

@ Itsu.

You can't find the resonance frequency due to
that the Q of the inductors is 1, that is because the load
that you have coupled in parallel destroys it.
I propose you to perform this experiment and tell me
if you managed to find it.

You will see that the tension that appears in the union of the
inducers does not obey under any concept to what
there should be if you do the math.

Thanks you.

YoElMiCrO.

Liked by

Admin

Fighter posted this 10 November 2022

Replying To: Itsu

Thanks ☺️

No, unfortunately after more than a year of experiments my MEG replication was not successful.

But that unsuccessful replication was actually the base platform where my ZPM device development started from.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

Liked by

Shelfordella posted this 11 November 2022

When the switch closes, the source is powering the coil and the load, maybe it will be working if a second switch is added between the coil and the load with an inverted driving signal, so the load is powered only by the coil.

"A little theory and calculation would have saved Edison 90 per cent of the labor." Nikola Tesla

Liked by

Itsu posted this 11 November 2022 - Last Edited 11 November 2022

Replying To: YoElMiCrO

YoElMiCrO,

Yes, the load of my 3x 12V / 5W bulbs is about 9 Ohm or so, so rather heavy.

But that is also the case with Fighter his setup i guess, so he also should see no resonance due to the (over)load of his bulbs parallel to the Coils.

When following your experiment (no load, a STTH12R06 diode between coils and drain MOSFET, 15V input voltage) i get the following screenshot:

yellow: voltage signal between L2 and diode,
purple: voltage signal gate MOSFET,
Green: current input PS.

So we do see a resonance around 150kHz 👍

Not sure what you mean by:

You will see that the tension that appears in the union of the
inducers does not obey under any concept to what
there should be if you do the math.

Thanks, Regards Itsu

Liked by

Vidura posted this 11 November 2022

Replying To: Itsu

It refers to an effect which appears with parametric resonance, on the tap between the two coils a very high potential appears, it is likely that a neon globe will lite when approaching this area. It depends on the relationship of the inductors and other parameters. It is very similar to the hot end of a Tesla resonator.

Vidura

Liked by

Itsu posted this 11 November 2022

Replying To: Vidura

Vidura,

OK, thanks, i will try to check this with a neon bulb, a loose hanging probe or even my HV probe.

Itsu

Liked by

Itsu posted this 11 November 2022

Quoting:Fighter

Replying To: Itsu

Thanks ☺️

No, unfortunately after more than a year of experiments my MEG replication was not successful.

But that unsuccessful replication was actually the base platform where my ZPM device development started from.

Regards,

Fighter

Fighter, thanks, i bought the AMCC-200 core for doing a MEG replication, and might do it lateron, but i have heard about to much failed replications already.

Itsu

Liked by

Itsu posted this 11 November 2022

Quoting:Shelfordella

When the switch closes, the source is powering the coil and the load, maybe it will be working if a second switch is added between the coil and the load with an inverted driving signal, so the load is powered only by the coil.

Shelfordella,

thanks for the idea, might be something to look at to separate the BEMF pulse from the input.

Itsu

Liked by

Admin

Fighter posted this 11 November 2022

Quoting:Itsu

Fighter, thanks, i bought the AMCC-200 core for doing a MEG replication, and might do it lateron, but i have heard about to much failed replications already.

Itsu

No problem !

Actually I may reconsider, I came to the conclusion that I didn't had all the required information and understanding at that time.

I don't want to go off-topic here or to derail your ZPM experiment but seems the way J.L. Naudin and all of us understood how MEG works is incorrect, actually as Tom Bearden says about MEG at 11:51 in the video below:

The biggest action in the MEG is an electric field transformer not an magnetic field transformer...

Basically, unlike any other transformers in the world, MEG is employing the Aharonov-Bohm effect to concentrate and gather the zero-point energy in form of uncurled electric field formed around the core.

I'd wish I'd had this information when I worked on replicating MEG !

That's why I prepared and started an experiment which seems to confirm what Tom Bearden said:

https://www.beyondunity.org/thread/aharonov-bohm-effect-as-zero-point-energy-concentrator/

When you have some time read the thread and especially watch the video, I think you will find it interesting as it could change the way we understand how MEG works.

Personally I intend to continue the experiment when possible as this principle have the potential to be useful in any of our devices not only in MEG and could be a huge advance in our research.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

Liked by

Shelfordella posted this 11 November 2022

Quoting:Itsu

Quoting:Shelfordella

When the switch closes, the source is powering the coil and the load, maybe it will be working if a second switch is added between the coil and the load with an inverted driving signal, so the load is powered only by the coil.

Shelfordella,

thanks for the idea, might be something to look at to separate the BEMF pulse from the input.

Itsu

Hi Itsu,

you're welcome. That's not exactly what I meant, but this is a good idea to try too. What I meant was separating the input pulse from the load, so that a pulse only powers the bucking coils. Also, the resonant frequency is dependent on the time constant L/R, more load in parallel equals less resistance equals higher time constant equals lower pulse repetition rate required to complete a full cycle. There isn't really a resonant frequency, but instead an optimal repetition rate.

"A little theory and calculation would have saved Edison 90 per cent of the labor." Nikola Tesla

Liked by