Romanian ZPM (Zero Point Module)

About the physics involved here it's not my specialty (I'm a software developer) but as it contradicts some of the rules of our current standard physics I think the explanations are actually related to quantum physics which also contradicts our standard physics (see particle entanglement phenomenon). I'm just guessing here but I think opposing magnetic fields at high-frequency create "holes" in the zero-point / quantum/ aether field, however we choose to call it, a field which is present anywhere in the universe. And just like when we create a hole in the water, that field is equilibrating those "holes" and that movement create extra-energy which is collected by all the over-unity devices. Of course, opposing magnetic fields is just a way to accomplish that, there are other kind of devices doing this in other ways but even there magnetic fields are involved, they're using electromagnets or permanent magnets. But as I said physics is not my field of expertise and I don't intend to pursue the direction of explaining theoretically what's happening in these devices, that's physicists work when they will decide to wake up and get their heads out of sand. My project and my goal are for building a device having COP higher than 3 so it can power itself and in the same time power a let's say 100W load.

Now what about the next stage, where it will go from here ?

I call this new stage "enhancements stage". Measuring COP should become more precise and should be done in real-time so I can work on fine-tuning. Measuring let's say the output using light-bulbs luminosity is not a option anymore like it was in the previous stage 🙂

Right now I'm working on a filter which hopefully would be a solution for my "confused" DC source and its readings. The assumption is DC source's readings are messed up because of high-frequency noise coming back to it from the MOSFET driver and /or ZPM. If that's the case maybe this filter suggested by Vidura will solve the problem:

A suggestion for a simple and good filter for keeping out interference from our measuring devices. The values of the components are not at all critical, but may need some adaptation for the expected frequencies. Ceramic decoupling  and tantalium caps for the smaller values perform better. The meters could be replaced by a scope as well.

Regards Vidura.

But if (as I suspect) the DC source's "confusion" is created by the fact that ZPM is sending power back there would be another approach: I need to figure out if ZPM is really using that big capacitor from the DC source as its own component and find a way to stop it doing that because I want that power to be put to use on the real output therefore this would increase the COP. Would be nice if by doing that I would get COP closer to 2. Also by doing that I would prepare a later stage where ZPM should be separated from the DC source and made to work on batteries. But doing this will require a lot of time and experiments.

Another step is to make a real-time reliable power measurement system for both input and output using current-sensing resistors and connected on that system two channels of the oscilloscope, maybe additionally some digital and also analog measurement instruments. That would require a lot of work to build and especially to calibrate to make sure the readings are correct all the time.

Having this real-time measurement system would allow me to fine-tune ZPM while having real-time COP shown because right now I'm finding the optimal frequency by increasing-decreasing it by 1KHz steps but for fine-tuning I should go to 1Hz steps. This hopefully would allow to have some significant increase of the COP but I estimate it will take a lot of time to ensure the system's readings are reliable in any conditions and considering I don't have too much free time it will take a while.

Another step would be to explore other coils configurations. That could significantly increase the COP as I'm sure I didn't matched from the beginning the optimal coils configuration of this device, I just used 1:2 ratio but there could be other ratios which could have great impact on COP as you can see from these posts:

Hello everyone.

I think I know how it is possible to extract energy from the vacuum.
It turns out that the magnetic permeability behavior
It has a region in which it is negative!
As if it were a tunnel diode, it also has it.
Only in this, we draw the current from the source and its
behavior as an amplifier is real.
Because the negative region in ferromagnetic materials
It is expressed by permeability, it interacts with the vacuum.
Here the graph of their behavior.

This image is just a sample of how permeability changes
depending on the current through the inductor that makes up the system,
It is merely illustrative.
That is why there are two operating points, one is static and depends on the
load, and other dynamic and depends on the frequency.
I continue with the experiments that prove that the OU is possible, it is still a
Hypothesis not a theory.
It would not violate any thermodynamic law because it extracts the energy of an entity
We still don't understand.

@Fighter.
I still do tests to understand your experiment, but everything has to do
with magnetic permeability and standing waves.
The turns ratios must be quadratic because the inductance is.
This means that the turns ratios will be the root of 0.75, 0.5 or 0.25 of lambda for
one of your inductors N2 = SQR (n) N1, where n is one of the previous numbers.

Thank you all in advance.
YoElMiCrO.

@YoElMiCrO: In my current setup "L" coil has approx. 150 turns and "R" coil approx. 300 turns.

N2 = 150 turns, N1 = 300 turns.

So N2 = 0.5 * N1 = SQR(0.25) * N1, it matches the case where n = 0.25.

Other configurations would be:

1. N2 = SQR(0.5) * N1 = 0.70 * 300 = 210 turns for coil L where n = 0.5; Lturns / Rturns = 210/300;

2. N2 = SQR(0.75) * N1 = 0.86 * 300 = 258 turns for coil L where n = 0.75; Lturns / Rturns = 258/300.

Of course N1 can be increased or decreased too, I just calculated for N1 = 300 turns where I want to keep "R" coil as it is now and just modify "L1" coil.

Interesting, very interesting... If your hypothesis is confirmed we may have a formula to design any configuration for this device. I wonder which case is better in terms of efficiency.

So this would be a draft of this new "enhancements stage". At least how I see it right now, I'm sure as I progress other steps could be added or some steps could be removed, it's not something which could be planned precise from the beginning, it's research and experiments and could lead anywhere. Sorry it was a long post, it took me 2 hours but I hope it answered your questions and with this occasion I've made a summary of the current status of the ZPM and I drafted a plan to what I intend to do in the near future. Depending on the free time I will have it may take a while to do this.