Fighter
posted this
25 September 2019
@SolarLab
Hi Fighter,
Very impressive work!
...Some great work so far - no doubts that your very close to cracking this! Good luck.
SL
...
IMHO:
Get the SiC MOSFET Switch working properly ... then you can play around with looking at the "undiscovered secrets."
Anyway, that's the approach we use, it may not be the only method... But, be careful not to be fooling your selves hoping for an easier way.
Could you not contradict yourself ?
What I show here is real-life experiments and results and you're talking theoretically.
... then you can play around with looking at the "undiscovered secrets."
I can be ironic too, I can ask you where is your ZPM replication with perfect switching without ringings proving that I'm wrong and you're right ? Or at least the device you're working on ?
Let's see you driving coils which generate 200Vpp spikes and your MOSFETs switching perfectly without any ringing, do you think it's possible ? Because I doubt it.
You can have perfect switching with a little light-bulb but not with ZPM's coils, these coils generate asymetric magnetic fields opposing each other and interacting.
Simulate this and you'll see your simulation will show that ZPM should consume all your DC source's power only in this process of opposing magnetic fields, ZPM's coils should be hot as hell from those magnetic fields fighting each other and there should not be enough power remaining for powering 2 x 12V/55W light-bulbs.
I'm open to any suggestion but I am the one deciding which way to go, wasting time and money looking for a illusory "perfect switching" is not what I intend to do.
I still have other important steps to do in the improvement process, like building a real-time input/output measurements system which would help me a lot in the tuning process and (if possible) to "blind" ZPM so it stops sending power back to the DC source and use that power in a useful way to power additional loads on its output.
Sorry but I don't get over it when I work 10-15 hours per month documenting and sharing details about my experiments with everyone here and someone comes and says I'm " playing around with looking at "undiscovered secrets" ". I'm repeating what I said before with other occasion: show me your data. Not "simulations", real experiments and real data resulted from those experiments. Then we could talk about who's wrong and who's right.
P.S.:
Anyway, that's the approach we use
"We" ? Who are those "we" ? You and who else ?
| "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of
energy, frequency and
vibration." |
|
|
Nikola Tesla |
