Beyond Unity - AlteredUnity's successful ZPM replication

AlteredUnity posted this 16 January 2023

Hey everyone, im glad you started a new community, its a shame your device went from "should be first device to replicate after Non-inductive coil" to a toy, to deleted.

300Turn coil : measurements were made with both coils on center of core at 1khz; Coils were then put at far opposite ends of top and bottom of core.

20awg; L = 425mH; DCR = 1.73 ohms

150Turn coil : 20awg; L = 110.7mH; DCR = 0.818 ohms

This is a fast trial run, have more to come with some ideas that may improve opperation. With this configureation I still pull 7 watts of power, so there isn't a whole lot of feedback.

The center tap is connected to cable running to my cars body ground; The scope is connected across load, with its ground on the DRAIN of mosfet. This may be the wrong configuration and reason for not lowering input.

Any pointers are appreciated.

beyond-unity zpm

Attached Files

Liked by
and 3 others

Admin

Fighter posted this 19 February 2023

It doesn't quite look like the zpm waveform

It's true, it doesn't look like the ZPM specific waveform but you should always keep in mind that the waveform I presented is showing the voltage only.

I see the DC source is showing 23.3 W and the 50 W light bulb's luminosity is pretty strong. You should find the way to decrease more the current on input, right now it looks like it's 0.93 A. Try more combinations of voltage/frequency/duty-cycle which will make the input current go lower.

just thought it was good progress, because the input actually drops as I raise the duty cycle, as the output gets brighter(which is sort of counterintuitive)

Actually if you see the input decreasing effect appearing it's a very good progress, that means you're on the right track. Ignore the waveform for now, just concentrate on making the effect stronger. You'll see as you have less and less current on input the voltage waveform on output will get closer to the ZMP specific waveform pattern containing that strong negative pulse and then the "ringing" section (in the photos below the light bulb is 12V/35W):

119khz with 35% duty cycle

Try this: first increase voltage on input, then decrease duty-cycle to maybe 25% and then find the new resonant frequency.

this is a very interesting configuration, thank you fighter for sharing

You're welcome. 🙂 Keep improving the effect and you'll see the 50 W light bulb's luminosity will get stronger with less current on input !

How much is the input current decreasing right now when the input decreasing effect is manifesting ?

If possible share it in a video.

Very good progress, thanks for sharing !

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

Liked by
and 1 others

AlteredUnity posted this 24 February 2023 - Last Edited 24 March 2023

I will post a video when I set back up. Turns out it was the filter I had connected that was possibly blocking the ZPM output. I was curious myself about the scope readings, and I don't believe my waveforms were scaled properly to be read accurately will need to use cursor instead of screen, after scaling correctly.

Liked by
and 1 others

Jagau posted this 21 March 2023

Hi alteredunity
If you try with a third coil you will have good results, try and experiment when the resonance frequency of the two opposing coils is reached, the third coil achieves very good results.
Jagau

Liked by

Shelfordella posted this 22 March 2023

Hi, does anyone understand why and could explain how a repetitively DC pulsed coil assembly adheres to resonance, when the purpose of the pulses in a 3 coil assembly is to regauge the potential on the POCs to make them self-act through mutual action during offtime? Resonance is defined as synchronicity of which the repetition rate is tuned to and the same as a natural frequency to compound (or attenuate) the signal.

"A little theory and calculation would have saved Edison 90 per cent of the labor." Nikola Tesla

Liked by

AlteredUnity posted this 23 March 2023 - Last Edited 24 March 2023

Replying To: Shelfordella

When the pulsed DC is applied to L1, it generates a pulsed electromagnetic field. If the frequency and duty cycle of the pulses are precisely tuned to match the natural resonant frequency of the coil assembly, the magnetic fields of L2 and L3 can become synchronized, leading to resonance. Then of course you get higher voltage, also higher current(as seen by Mr. Preva experiment), so better efficiency. Your question was a bit confusing but hope this helps.

Liked by

AlteredUnity posted this 23 March 2023 - Last Edited 27 August 2023

To expand a little, and feel free to add or correct anything that seems wrong.

We want to drive our coils in resonance. This will occur when the frequency of the repetitively pulsed DC current matches the resonant frequency of the coils( And any other components in the system!), resulting in a larger amplitude of oscillation.

The pulses are to regauge the potential on the output coils, to make them "self-act through mutual action" during the off time.

Once mastered, implementing a feedback circuit to adjust the timing and amplitude of the pulses to maintain resonance. Im not that far along yet. Just saying.

Based on the circuits Jagau has sourced to us, he/we may be able to make self-actuating circuit(Like the SRO) to operate at resonance.

Duty cycle plays a big role here as well. It can increase the coupling factor of the coils, as well as producing a big enough magnetic field. In Fighters ZPM, he uses 25% and probably has to because if its too low the coils may not reach resonance conditions at all. If too large, you are feeding from the source and/or wasting power you can saturate the core etc. and will cause resonance to become unstable.

This tells us also we need to pick our primary carefully, by having thicker wire we decrease inductance per turn, but we get a lot less resistance on the primary which is ideal for your situation. We need enough turns to have a good enough coupling with L2, though not so much that it will take too long to to get to max amplitude during the regauging period.

The primary winding, L1, is typically designed with a low resistance and a high inductance, in order to efficiently convert the pulsed DC input voltage into a magnetic field.

Liked by

Admin

Fighter posted this 24 March 2023

Hi AlteredUnity,

If I may add a note, keep in mind in my ZPMs I didn't always used 25%. Sometimes I used higher duty-cycle (30 to 50%) and I searched for a new resonance/optimal frequency to work with the new duty-cycle value.

Also everytime I changed the loads I needed to find the new resonance/optimal point and for that I had two options:

keep the current duty-cycle and look for a new frequency which will decrease the input to minimum while making the light bulbs on output to be at maximum possible;
modify both the duty-cycle and frequency until the input is decreased at minimum while making the light bulbs on output to be at maximum possible.

I know it sounds complicated but it's not, in time I learned ZPM's behavior and I learned how to find a new resonance point quickly everytime I made changes on the load (different light bulbs with different consumption).

But there is something correct about the 25% duty-cycle, with my both ZPMs when I try to go below 25% the input is increasing more and more showing to me that I'm going away from ZPM's resonance/optimal point.

That's the reason why in all my videos showing experiments I always show the duty-cycle and the frequency used on signal generator. Also the photos I posted for every experiment are showing the duty-cycle and frequency used on signal generator for that experiment.

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

Liked by

AlteredUnity posted this 24 March 2023 - Last Edited 24 March 2023

Thank you Fighter, the last explanation was for Shelfordella's circuit(so he didnt get the same response 100 times from the site he came from, and now prob banned for posting here), and based on your reply it may still apply to your circuit. A load would decrease the resonant frequency as it increases the impedance and dampening factor, so resonance isnt so pronounced. I asked Jagau to help with a configuration that will have 2 cap banks, capB1 and capB2. The fist cycle capB1 is charged, during the reguage period, capB1 is switched to load and capB2 is switched to capB1's position. With every cycle it flips. This will take a bit of experiment to find right caps/resistor and load configuration, but it will then isolate the load from the process and keep Fr constant ideally. For the ZPM this would be great seeing the power it puts out. I have all the parts, just not time to test, study, and implement this, though if anyone with ideas or background to give some pointers for this to work please don't be afraid to share.

Also, been busy lately but waiting on more wire to wind my ZPM correctly, and will definitely post as soon as I have time to set back up. The only reason this is ify with ZPM is because of you last experience with capacitors on the output, but if you can charge a cap to the max ur machine will give , later move to running a transformer off that to power a load or something along those lines. If you have time, maybe you already have, but can you show ur zpm running, then switch loads, tune to frequency, then adjust duty cycle to see the interaction the duty cycle has on the circuit?

Liked by

Atti posted this 24 March 2023

Hi everyone.

does anyone understand why and could explain how a repetitively DC pulsed coil assembly adheres to resonance, when the purpose of the pulses in a 3 coil assembly is to regauge the potential on the POCs to make them self-act through mutual action during offtime?

This is just my opinion. You don't have to agree with it.

Obviously only the person who came up with the original concept (if credible) can explain it properly, but since there are similarities from other people's work done years ago, I'll just refer you to what the light years ahead of you Sensei says.
( The work of others,or their implementation should not be addressed at this moment. )
The original implementations,measurements cannot be relied upon because they have not been shown to anyone by Sensei. There is no public measurement data. No public operational video recordings. No public blueprints. Just some video footage that misleads. Just a few effects that suggest the alleged operation. It's because it covers everything in theory but misses the point. If an inventor really wants to change the fate of the world, he should communicate it in a way that everyone can understand. He doesn't use words to prove his greatness as an inventor, but he has no material product. An oscilloscope picture proves nothing. That is why your claim is not credible. If L2-L3 helps the performance of L1, it does not mean that we have excess power. Just because the input current is reduced does not mean anything.
Many have tried the reconstruction. Why only the master succeeds. Isn't it strange?

But let's focus on the facts.

Let's look at the questions, the answers. Quote:

Why I do what I do is obviously known only to me (but it's no secret, Árpád Bóday's magnetodynamic machine)

Ok. 180° deviation. You can see it here:

But what do we see?
The left primary coil is getting a square wave signal. With a series capacitor on a series resonance. The loose coupling of the right coil causes a slight time delay.
(loosely coupled and that's important. Similar to the implementation of the sensei. But don't tell the Sensei! )

By putting the right parameters together, the phase relationship of the right and left inductors can affect the two inductors in the middle. The two inductors in the middle are connected opposite each other. So under conventional excitation conditions, there can be no induced voltage in them. The two coils in the middle would replace the inductance L2-L3. At a suitable resonance point, it can be seen that a voltage is excited between the two points. Since this is a barren design, the current drawn from the power supply at the resonance point is reduced by sense. So is this free energy?

I would like to see practical implementations by others. It could be the ZPM.
( leave the theory for later)

Atti.

Liked by
and 1 others

Admin

Fighter posted this 25 March 2023

Quoting:Atti

Obviously only the person who came up with the original concept (if credible) can explain it properly, but since there are similarities from other people's work done years ago, I'll just refer you to what the light years ahead of you Sensei says.
( The work of others,or their implementation should not be addressed at this moment. )
The original implementations,measurements cannot be relied upon because they have not been shown to anyone by Sensei. There is no public measurement data. No public operational video recordings. No public blueprints. Just some video footage that misleads. Just a few effects that suggest the alleged operation. It's because it covers everything in theory but misses the point. If an inventor really wants to change the fate of the world, he should communicate it in a way that everyone can understand. He doesn't use words to prove his greatness as an inventor, but he has no material product. An oscilloscope picture proves nothing. That is why your claim is not credible. If L2-L3 helps the performance of L1, it does not mean that we have excess power. Just because the input current is reduced does not mean anything.
Many have tried the reconstruction. Why only the master succeeds. Isn't it strange?

I agree, I told him in our public reply thread "Put your money where your mouth is, just like we did !".

After 6 years he is still not being able to show a device (using "his" so-called partnered output coils) which demonstrate practically the behavior of a overunity device. So, as you say, no material product. It demonstrates that he and "his" so-called partnered output coils are a fraud.

About ZPM, we got tens of experiments/demonstrations documented (initially on the old aboveunity site, now we have them imported here), it was replicated by our members here (including you) and it shows the most important behavior of a overunity device: input decreasing (to just a few milliamperes, 12mA to be more specific) while powering two 55W light bulbs:

Just because the input current is reduced does not mean anything.

Well, I strongly disagree. That's the most important behavior of a truly overunity device.

You know during the years I did shown images like the one above to a few very experienced people.

They understood exactly what they're looking at and always their first reaction was "it's impossible" or "the images are photoshopped". 🙂

After that I also shown to them the videos with ZPM running they were very baffled.

And something else: one of them, expert in power systems for devices working at high frequencies told me something: "You should trust your DC source no matter what kind of waveforms or what frequencies your device is working with. You can always fool the standard power meters or multimeters because they're made to measure a limited range of frequencies (50/60Hz up to a few tens of KHz) but it's very hard to fool a laboratory power supply...".

Regards,

Fighter

"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."
		Nikola Tesla

Liked by